Editorial Policy — Blind but Dangerous (Roblox)
Every factual page names its sources and check dates. Page modification dates describe substantive revisions; API snapshots and historical observations keep their own timestamps.
Codes
The published-codes table records strings currently listed by public sources, with the number of independent reporting families. Different expiry conclusions stay visible in Sources. The status column counts independent source families for the code string. Reward evidence has its own count. A roundup citing another tracker does not add an independent confirmation. When BloxStatus says there is nothing to redeem, that sentence stays in Sources.
Numbers, prices, and dates
Visits, votes, pass prices, and badge awards are copied from the public reading and dated. We do not estimate a missing reward. We do not turn a like-target edit into the birthday of a code. SpawnRadar times are sample times, and the page says so.
What we leave out
No script code, no injector names, no private-server downloads, and no map or item names the description does not give. Round length, whistle gap, and key binds stay unwritten until a public source states them. Corrections arrive at the contact address and have to point at a URL. The scheduled code collector produces candidates only; it never overwrites published code data.
What counts as two sources?
Two write-ups that are not the same article copied forward. LootWiki saying it cites Destructoid is not a second independent source.
Why are some rewards blank?
The expired codes are an example. Three pages name the strings and none of them print a coin amount. The cell stays empty.
How are changes collected?
The scheduled collector saves per-source candidates for editorial review. It cannot overwrite reviewed rewards, source counts, or expiry dates.
Sources
- About — Checked 5 Nov 2026. Who publishes the site.
- Contact — [email protected]